AC Resonant Test System — Variable Frequency & Variable Inductance Series Resonant
On-site AC withstand and partial discharge testing for power cables, transformers, GIS and generators — a pure sine wave, partial discharge below 10 pC, and a source rated for a fraction of the test power instead of all of it.
20–300 Hz
Variable-frequency tuning range
< 3%
Output waveform distortion
< 10 pC
Partial discharge background
Q 10–100
Quality factor (variable inductance)
1600 kV
Series reactor stack ceiling
Auto → 0 V
Voltage collapse on flashover
AUDIENCE: TEST ENGINEERS · PROCUREMENT · LAB MANAGERS
Why On-Site HV Withstand Testing Fails Without a Series Resonant System
Conventional Power-Frequency Constraints
Take a conventional power-frequency test transformer to a long XLPE cable run and the problem appears at once: the charging current of a few kilometres of high-voltage cable is large, the source becomes a multi-hundred-kVA machine, and the assembly is too heavy to shuttle between joint bays. Push the voltage up and a flashover dumps the full energy of a stiff source into the fault, turning a salvageable defect into a destroyed termination. Worse, a saturated transformer distorts the waveform and masks the partial discharge signature you are trying to read.
Resonant Tuning Implementation
Resonant tuning removes both failure modes. A reactor's inductive reactance cancels the capacitive reactance of the cable, GIS or generator winding, so the input power drops to roughly 1/Q of the reactive load; the output stays a pure sine wave with waveform distortion below 3%; and at breakdown the circuit detunes, so the test voltage falls to zero on its own and the fault receives no power.
PRIMARY: TEST ENGINEERS
SECONDARY: PROCUREMENT
DEMIKS AC Resonant Test Systems — Variable Frequency vs Variable Inductance Models & Selection
Variable Frequency Series Resonant Test System
Frequency-tuned across 20–300 Hz with a chip-generated signal source held to 0.1 Hz frequency stability and output voltage instability under 1%. Modular cylinder reactors are rated 400 kV per insulating case and connect in series up to 1600 kV, or in parallel for higher current. Optical-fibre communication isolates the high-voltage and low-voltage control circuits. Suited to power cables, GIS, large transformers and generator windings where reactors must be light, stackable and fast to tune.
Variable Inductance Series Resonant Test System
Power frequency stays at 50/60 Hz and the reactor inductance is changed by moving the core, which keeps the test at network frequency for transformer applied-voltage work and capacitive instrument transformers. Its quality factor runs between 10 and 100, so only 1/Q of the test power is drawn from the supply. With a metal-tank reactor and an HV bushing it can sit outdoors and run continuously, which is why this variant is the common choice for van- and skid-mounted portable rigs.
ENGINEERING NOTE — SYSTEM COMPOSITION
One complete set is a switchgear cabinet, a variable-frequency power source or voltage regulator, an excitation transformer (which can be built into a metal-tank reactor), the high-voltage resonant reactor, a capacitor voltage divider that doubles as the coupling capacitor for partial discharge, and a computer-aided control and measurement chain reading voltage, partial discharge and capacitance dielectric loss. A low-voltage power filter holds the partial discharge background down so on-site measurement stays meaningful. Reactors run a short time at rated current; multiple non-magnetic-steel bases carry series or parallel stacks, with at least one base able to keep the assembly balanced and fitted with lifting points.
Selection decision matrix
| Test object & class | Recommended variant | Reactor configuration | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| HV/EHV XLPE cable, 110–500 kV, several km | Variable frequency | Cylinder reactors in series, frequency-tuned 20–300 Hz | Large, varying capacitance; 20–300 Hz keeps the set inside IEC 60840 / 62067 |
| GIS / gas-insulated switchgear, 110–550 kV | Variable frequency | Series stack to required kV; PD coupling via divider | Low fixed capacitance, high voltage; light stackable reactors |
| Power transformer applied-voltage test, 50/60 Hz mandated | Variable inductance | Tank-type reactor, inductance-tuned at power frequency | Standard requires the test at network frequency |
| Generator stator winding | Variable inductance | Tank reactor, fixed frequency | Inductive-capacitive object tested at service frequency |
| Mobile MV/HV cable commissioning fleet | Variable inductance | Van-mounted tank reactor + HV bushing, continuous duty | Outdoor-rated, continuous operation, single transportable unit |
| Capacitive instrument transformer / capacitor bank | Either | Matched to object capacitance | Pure capacitive load; variant follows frequency requirement |
Where a project mixes objects — a substation acceptance test that covers GIS, the connecting cable and a transformer — a variable frequency set with a reactor count chosen for the largest capacitance usually covers the range of testing requirements.
Series Resonant vs Test Transformer vs VLF — Performance and Cost Comparison
These three methods are not interchangeable, and the right answer is set as much by the standards as by preference. To make the trade-off visible, the table below uses concrete figures rather than ratings.
| Parameter | Series resonant (DEMIKS) | Conventional test transformer | VLF (0.1 Hz) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source power vs test power | ≈ 1/Q (Q 10–100) → ~5–10% of load kVA | ≈ 100% of load kVA | Low — 0.1 Hz reactive demand ~1/600 of 60 Hz |
| Test frequency | 20–300 Hz (VF) / 50–60 Hz (VL) | 50 / 60 Hz fixed | 0.1 Hz (and lower) |
| Output waveform distortion | < 3%, pure sine | Distorts under saturation | Non-sinusoidal / cosine-rectangular |
| Partial discharge measurement | < 10 pC background, IEC 60270 capable | Limited by waveform purity | Not the reference PD method |
| HV cable after-installation (IEC 60840/62067) | Accepted (20–300 Hz AC) | Accepted but impractical at length | Not accepted for HV extruded cable |
| Typical object class | HV/EHV cable, GIS, transformer, generator | Lab / factory, shorter objects | MV cable ≤ ~35 kV |
| Behaviour at flashover | Detunes, voltage → 0 V | Stiff source feeds the fault | Low energy |
| Field transport | Modular reactors, ~1 h set-up | Heavy single machine | Lightest |
Read the table by duty rather than by row. For medium-voltage distribution cable up to about 35 kV, VLF is the lighter, lower-power field choice and the relevant standards support it. The moment the object is a high-voltage extruded cable, GIS or a large transformer, IEC 60840 and IEC 62067 require a substantially sinusoidal AC voltage between 20 and 300 Hz and do not accept DC or VLF for that after-installation duty — which makes the series resonant system the standards-mandated method, not one option among several. Cost follows from the first row: because the source covers only the losses, the supply, the harmonic filter and the transport all shrink with it.
PRIMARY: LAB MANAGERS
SECONDARY: TEST ENGINEERS (TECHNICAL VALIDATION)
Field Outcomes — PD < 10 pC, ~1/Q Source Power, Zero Flashover Damage
What the design buys you on site is measured by three outcomes: First, sensitivity—the pure sine output and optical-fibre isolation hold the partial discharge background under 10 pC, so an IEC 60270 measurement remains readable in the electrically noisy environment of a live substation, where background noise—not the cable—is typically what limits a field PD test. Second, power—with a quality factor of 10 to 100 the supply delivers around 1/Q of the reactive test power, and published high-voltage engineering practice places a resonant set at about 5-10% of the kVA a traditional test transformer of the same output would require. Third, containment—when an object breaks down the circuit detunes and the voltage falls to zero, so a recoverable defect does not become a destroyed accessory.
As a reference point for scale, commissioning crews energise three-phase 400 kV XLPE cable systems longer than 20 km to around 330 kV for 60 minutes with a resonant set while running on-site partial discharge — a duty a transportable transformer cannot reasonably meet. Our systems are built for that class of object; project-specific figures depend on cable length, capacitance and site conditions, and we size the reactor stack to the object rather than quoting a single headline figure.
That power ratio also underpins the ownership case. Test-equipment cost analysis turns on utilisation: once a set is used for more than roughly 30 weeks a year, owning beats renting after calibration, mobilisation and the downtime on rented gear are counted, and utilities that build their own HV test capability report a real return through faster commissioning and fewer outsourced test windows. Below that threshold, renting or outsourcing is the rational call — a framework, not a fixed promise, and the procurement section makes the cost drivers explicit.
~5–10%
Source kVA a series resonant system needs versus a conventional test transformer of the same output — the supply covers only the active losses, not the full reactive test power.
Source: high-voltage engineering practice for resonant transformers (input/output reduced by factor 1/Q, Q typically 10–100). DEMIKS reactor quality factor: Q 10–100.
GET IN TOUCH WITH DEMIKS COMPANY
WP Armour ( Only visible to site administrators. Not visible to other users. )
This form has a honeypot trap enabled. If you want to act as spam bot for testing purposes, please click the button below.
PRIMARY: PROCUREMENT
SECONDARY: TEST ENGINEERS (STANDARD APPLICABILITY)
Standards & Compliance — IEC 60060, 60840, 62067 and IEEE 400
For a high-voltage test set the standards are the specification, so they are stated here by number rather than in prose. Our resonant systems perform the AC withstand and partial discharge duties these documents define.
IEC 60060-1/-3
HV test techniques — general & on-site
IEC 60840
Cable after-install test, ≤ 150 kV
IEC 62067
Extruded cable test, > 150 kV
IEC 60270
Partial discharge measurement
IEEE 400 / 400.4
Field cable test & DAC PD
What matters to a test engineer: IEC 60840 and IEC 62067 set the after-installation withstand voltage — on the order of 1.7–2.0 U₀ for cables up to 150 kV, and 1.7 U₀ or lower above 150 kV — and require it at a substantially sinusoidal 20–300 Hz, which the variable frequency system delivers directly. IEC 60270 governs the partial discharge measurement the system supports through its coupling capacitor and divider, while IEEE 400.4 frames the PD-monitored field approach. Treat any test set whose documentation lists standards without numbers as unverified until the numbers are supplied.
PRIMARY: PROCUREMENT
SECONDARY: LAB MANAGERS (BUDGET APPROVAL)
Procurement Guide — Configuration, Pricing Factors
For a resonant system, applied to the test object, there is not one list price - and an offer that clearly does not specify its prerequisites is difficult to compare. Apply the factor framework below to frame a request, and interpret rival proposals on the same basis.
What drives the price of a series resonant test system
The cost moves with a handful of dimensions, not a catalogue number: the rated test voltage and the number of reactor units needed to reach it; the maximum capacitance of the largest object, which sets reactor current and count; variable frequency versus variable inductance; cylinder versus metal-tank reactor and whether the rig is fixed, skid- or van-mounted; the partial discharge measurement chain and divider class; the control-and-measurement automation level; and freight, which on high-voltage reactors is heavy and varies sharply by destination. Ask every supplier to quote reactor count, excitation transformer, divider, control system and shipping as explicit line items, and to state the scope of supply — what sits within their battery limits — so the landed cost, not just the headline figure, is what you compare.
FAQ
Variable frequency or variable inductance — which should I choose?
Choose variable frequency for high-voltage cables, GIS and large transformers where you want lighter, stackable reactors and fast automatic tuning across 20–300 Hz. Choose variable inductance when the test has to hold a fixed 50/60 Hz — transformer applied-voltage tests, capacitive instrument transformers — or when a single tank-type reactor on a van-mounted rig must run continuously in the field. Where one project spans both, a variable frequency set sized to the largest capacitance usually covers the range, which is why the quotation starts from your object list rather than a model number.
Why does a resonant system need so much less kVA than a test transformer?
Resonance between the reactor and the object's capacitance means the source supplies only the active losses — about 1/Q of the reactive power. With Q between 10 and 100, the supply rating falls to a small fraction of what a same-output test transformer would need, which is also why the set is light enough to move between joint bays.
Resonant or VLF for HV cable after-installation testing?
IEC 60840 and IEC 62067 require a substantially sinusoidal AC voltage at 20–300 Hz for HV extruded-cable after-installation tests and do not accept DC or VLF. VLF at 0.1 Hz suits medium-voltage cable up to about 35 kV; HV cable, GIS and transformers need the resonant method.
What partial discharge level can it reach on a noisy site?
Its pure sine output, low-voltage power filter and optical-fibre HV/LV isolation hold the partial discharge background below 10 pC, which keeps an IEC 60270 measurement readable on a noisy live substation.
What happens if the object flashes over during the test?
Resonance is lost the instant the object breaks down and the test voltage collapses to zero. Because a tuned source, not a stiff transformer, fed the object, the fault is contained rather than extended.
What voltage and capacitance do the modular reactors cover?
One insulating-cylinder reactor is rated 400 kV. Reactors stack in series for higher voltage — up to 1600 kV — or parallel for higher current, so the system is matched to the cable, GIS, transformer or generator class rather than sold as a fixed box. That is why the quotation always names a reactor count: it is the variable that ties the hardware to your specific test object and voltage class.
Is high-voltage withstand testing destructive?
It is a pass/fail proof voltage rather than a routine measurement, so it follows the non-destructive checks. Resonant detuning is what keeps a failure during the test from becoming collateral damage to the accessory.